[dateparser] Fix return type of search_dates#15539
Merged
brianschubert merged 1 commit intopython:mainfrom Mar 22, 2026
Merged
Conversation
dateparser.search.search_dates will return None if no parseable date could be found in the `text` argument. This is explained in the original docstring as well. Closes #15538.
Contributor
|
According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 |
Collaborator
No need, we auto-generate changelogs for the stub packages from the commit messages: https://github.com/typeshed-internal/stub_uploader/blob/main/data/changelogs/dateparser.md |
brianschubert
changed the title
search_dates
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
dateparser.search.search_dates will return None if no parseable date could be found in the
textargument.This is explained in the original docstring as well.
Closes #15538.
I'm unsure if I have to edit a changelog for this or something in that regard.